First, the quote:

Although the image is contrary to Jane Austen’s unassuming nature, I like to contemplate the “Pride and Prejudice” author in paradise, ruining eternity for the dour Brontë sisters and George Eliot by issuing smug daily updates about the mini-industry of Austen knock-offs that her work has inspired. “Bridget Jones’s Diary,” “The Jane Austen Book Club,” “Jane Austen in Scarsdale,” “Austenland,” “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies,” “Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict” and “Suspense and Sensibility” are but a few of the panegyrics, prequels, sequels and spin-offs produced thus far. The past year alone saw the release of more than three-dozen Jane-oriented titles, among them “Prada and Prejudice.” (And that’s not counting academic treatises.) “Pride and Extreme Prejudice,” anyone?

The Austen homage-wave apparently will continue in 2010: Witness the arrival of Cathleen Schine’s “The Three Weissmanns of Westport,” a fitfully appealing, rather too literal retelling of “Sense and Sensibility” set mostly on the Connecticut shores of Long Island Sound and in the posh redoubts of Manhattan’s Upper West Side.

Second, my take:
STOP KNOCKING OFF JANE AUSTEN AND CREATE YOUR OWN STORIES!

That’s all.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, February 5th, 2010 at 5:25 am and is filed under Classics, Discussion, Rants, Recently Published, Ridiculosity, Romance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 comments so far

 1 

Hear! Hear!

and people were complaining about Hollywood being unoriginal… looks like they’re not the only ones! ;)

February 5th, 2010 at 7:21 am
Gambit
 2 

But these are RITERS.* Professional RITERS! It’s their JOB to come up with an original yarn. THIS is where Hollywood gets their material, in theory. THIS is the fertile imaginative ground of the mind where ideas are born.

Or at least should be. I feel so let down.

*I am expropriating their initial “W” because these “riters” don’t deserve the full “writers” title. Yes, I have that power.

February 5th, 2010 at 8:09 am
 3 

maybe we should show them how it’s done? ;)

February 5th, 2010 at 10:35 am
Gambit
 4 

At least one of us is already doing that (hint: it’s not me) –

http://scriba.neolibrarium.com/

February 5th, 2010 at 10:40 am
GHP
 5 

I can’t believe you just narced on me!

February 5th, 2010 at 11:10 am
Gambit
 6 

Narced??? The link is on the front page!!! On top!! Placed there by you!!!

February 5th, 2010 at 2:23 pm
GHp
 7 

Yeah, but that’s experimentation…you’re making an example of me!
NARC!

February 5th, 2010 at 4:48 pm
 8 

Well then I guess I’d better click on the link! ;)

btw, what does “narced” mean? never heard it! sounds like an SAT word!!! :(

February 8th, 2010 at 4:14 pm
Gambit
 9 

narc = fink = stool pigeon = squealer = snitch = informant

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=narc

February 8th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment